|
International Awards for Liveable Communities
The
LivCom Awards
Newsletter No. 4 - November 2006
The LivCom Newsletter is intended to keep you
advised of developments relating to the LivCom
Awards. If you wish to contribute to the Newsletter
regarding your experience of LivCom or in respect of
any subject relevant to LivCom, please contact the
LivCom Office on
info@livcomawards.com
The LivCom Awards
The Awards were launched internationally in 1997 and are
endorsed by the United Nations Environment Programme and are
managed by a UK Company Limited by Guarantee, which
prohibits the distribution of any financial surpluses
earned, and is also a UK Registered Charity.
To access all details of the LivCom
Awards in 30 languages, click on
www.livcomawards.com
LivCom
2006
Award Winning
Communities and Projects Announced
The LivCom 2006 Finals took place in Hangzhou, China,
during 9th to 13th November. The International footprint of
the Awards continues to grow each year, with for the first
time communities representing India, Albania and Nigeria
participating in the Finals.
Each year there is an expectation that the standard will
rise, and consequently International Best Practice will be
further developed. At the Interim Judging Stage the Judges
imposed high standards, which was rewarded with excellent
innovative Presentations during the Finals.
One of the key elements of LivCom is the provision of the
opportunity for Delegates both to learn of successful
practices in other countries and cultures, and to meet and
form a relationship with representatives of those countries
and cultures. These new friendships will inevitably lead to
improved practices and the raising of the quality of life in
the communities involved.
Participation in the LivCom Awards need not be expensive,
but it is demanding, and so it should be if the Finals are a
forum for the presentation of International Best Practice.
A part of the Judging process is for Delegates to “assess”
the Presentations of other communities, and the result of
this public ‘Judging’ is taken into account by the
International panel of Judges when coming to a final
decision.
The Award winning Communities and Projects in the 2006
LivCom Awards were:

Population up to 20,000
| First Place |
Dungannon, Ireland |
| Second Place |
Ucluelet, Canada |
| Third Place |
Muskiz, Spain |

Population 20,0001 to 75,000
|
| First Place |
Brasschaat, Belgium |
| Second Place |
Tonglu, China |
| Third Place |
Mandurah, Australia |

Population 75,001 to 200,000
|
|
| First Place |
Gateshead, England |
| Second Place |
Stavanger, Norway |
| Third Place |
Whittlesea, Australia |

Population 200,001 to 750,000
|
|
| First Place |
Waitakere, New Zealand |
| Second Place |
Tirana, Albania |

Population over 750,000
|
|
| First Place |
Dongguan, China |
| Second Place |
Ekurhuleni, South Africa |
| Third Place |
Abuja, Nigeria |
Copies of the Initial Submissions of all of the First
Placed Communities are available on the LivCom website.
Criteria Awards
| Enhancement of the Landscape |
Muskiz, Spain |
| Heritage Management |
Dongguan, China |
| Environmentally Sensitive Practices |
Randwick, Australia |
| Community Sustainability |
Ucluelet, Canada |
| Healthy Lifestyles |
Meilin Village 1, China |
| Planning for the Future |
Whittlesea, Australia |
Bursary Award (£10,000)
Abuja, Nigeria
Projects:
Natural Projects
|
|
| First Place |
Sustainability, Randwick, Australia |
| Second Place |
Waste Transfer, Clonakilty, Ireland |
| Third Place |
El Pobal Foundry, Muskiz, Spain |
| |
|
Built Projects
|
|
| First Place |
Floraland Sunny Lido, Chengdu, China |
| Second Place |
Beijing Riverside, Beijing, China |
| Third Place |
Luneng Elite City, Qingdao, China |
LivCom
2007
2007 LivCom Awards Launched
Westminster, London
22nd to 26th November 2007
The 2007 LivCom Awards will take place in the UK for the
first time, and will be based in the heart of London, the
City of Westminster.
The structure of the Awards will remain the same as in 2006,
but with three important changes:
1. There will be no Registration Fee payable in respect of
entries into the Whole City Section of the Awards.
2. When a community enters the Whole City Section and the
Project Section of the Awards, no Registration Fee will be
payable in respect of the Project entry.
3. Registrations in the Project Section, not associated with
an entry in the Whole Community Section, will be subject to
a Registration Fee of £200.
Full details of the 2007 LivCom Awards may be found on the
LivCom website.

Jan-Gustav Strandenaes, the UNEP Special Representative
at the LivCom 2006 Awards presented the following Paper at
the opening of the Finals. “All human beings are born free
and equal in dignity and rights.”
The Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr. Kofi Annan,
gave the following opening in his landmark report called “In
larger Freedom” given to the United Nations General Assembly
in 2005:
“Five years into the new millennium, we have it in our power
to pass on to our children a brighter inheritance than that
bequeathed to any previous generation. We can halve global
poverty and halt the spread of major known diseases in the
next 10 years. We can reduce the prevalence of violent
conflict and terrorism. We can increase respect for human
dignity in every land. And we can forge a set of updated
international institutions to help humanity achieve these
noble goals. If we act boldly – and if we act together – we
can make people everywhere more secure, more prosperous and
better able to enjoy their fundamental human rights.”
In the report, Kofi Annan goes on to strike a strong and
optimistic note, when he claims:
“All the conditions are in place for us to do so!”
This is no small statement. On the contrary – this is a
statement that given the situation of the world – or some
would perhaps say ‘the plight of the world’ – this is a
statement that connotes almost excessive optimism: “All the
conditions are in place for us to do so.”
But the report from the Secretary General is no unrealistic
travel through a rosy global landscape. It is a sobering
report, and taken with other reports from the United Nations
that have been published of late, we know that we are faced
with a daunting challenge.
While the LivCom awards took place in the city of Hangzhou,
nations of this world assembled in Nairobi, the capital of
Kenya, and the headquarters of the United Nations
Environment Programme, where they participated in COP 12,
the 12th Conference of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol,
the global protocol enacted within the United Nations years
ago to help set standards for greenhouse gas emissions. The
Kyoto Protocol entered into legal force on February 16,
2005. The treaty had then been ratified by more than 140
countries. Concentration of carbon dioxide now stands at 372
parts per million, higher than at any time in at least the
past 420,000 years.
In an introductory note to the urban programme, UNEP writes
2:
“Climate change has severe impacts world wide, both on rural
areas and on urban centres. Extreme weather conditions
threaten human health and productivity, and natural
disasters such as flooding, wildfires and cyclones increase.
More than half of the world’s population now lives within 60
km of the sea and three quarters of all large cities are
located on the coast.
Melting ice caps will result in a rise in sea level, which
will threaten coastal infrastructure, while a thaw will
reduce the stability of cities located on permafrost.
The provision of water, sanitation and energy are all
affected. Climate change leads to changes of the natural
habitat, which facilitate the spread of vector borne
diseases such as malaria and dengue fever.”
“Climate change also affects local and regional weather
patterns, which can have effects on agricultural outputs and
may result in food shortages in cities. Rising temperatures
also result in increased energy use, especially in cities
where temperatures are already higher than in the
surrounding rural areas due to large expanses of concrete
and pavement. Loss of green cover in cities in the form of
parks, trees and agricultural land raises urban temperatures
as well as contributing to climate change.”
The report goes on to cite the voracious appetite cities
have for surrounding resources by explaining the vast
ecological footprint of a city, an ecological footprint
meaning the area of land needed to provide a city with the
resources it requires to function and to remove its wastes:
the demand for energy, foodstuffs, and its contribution to
loss of biodiversity through its man made infrastructure.
And there seems to be no end in sight: Emissions from
vehicle and transport equipment within urban areas are
presently rising at a rate of 2,5% a year – and give little
sign of abating. Unfortunately predictions are to the
contrary.
In a summary statement from UNEP relating to this highly
dramatic but sober appraisal of the situation of cities and
municipalities, we can read the following
3: “Over half the world’s
population now lives in cities. High urbanisation has severe
consequences on the local environment and the well being of
urban residents. Cities are increasingly degrading their
surrounding areas and the national, regional and global
environment. For example, cities are among the biggest
polluters of coastal areas and oceans. Urban activities
generate close to 80% of all carbon dioxide, or CO2
emissions, as well as significant amounts of other
greenhouse gases. “
Let us return for a minute to what Koffi Annan said in his
report, which was quoted earlier:
“If we act boldly – and if we act together – we can make
people everywhere more secure, more prosperous and better
able to enjoy their fundamental human rights…..All the
conditions are in place for us to do so!”
4
Which are the conditions that are in place?
Certainly the UN has worked hard to provide a number of
these conditions.
To take up the gauntlet from the Secretary General, I would
claim that just within the UN Environment Programme, there
is a plethora of conditions put in place for us to utilize.
There is an environment programme called
• The Cities Alliance
• There is the Sustainable Cities Programme
• And there is the Partnership for Clean Fuels and Vehicles
Do these initiatives create results?
Let me give you but a few examples from the rich catalogue
of success stories recorded as a result of cooperation
between municipalities and UNEP 5:
* The municipality of Olavarria in Argentina, developed a
programme to harness greenhouse gases emitted from their
landfills, and the programme’s overarching goal is to
develop affordable harnessing systems that can be replicated
and used by municipalities in the so called developing
world.
* Adelaide in Australia has developed a system through which
methane from landfills is captured and used to generate 15
giga-watt hours of electricity, enough to power 5000 homes
and at the same time offsetting the fossil fuel previously
used.
* Queretaro in Mexico replaced over the past few years 10
000 high watt, old street lights with more efficient lamps,
and cutting CO2 emissions with nearly 4000 tonnes per year.
* An electricity plant in Palencia in Spain uses residue
from olive oil production as a source for renewable energy,
producing enough electricity for 27 000 homes.
* And in the Partnership for Clean Fuels and Vehicles
programme, more than 80 organisations from the private
sector together with NGOs and local governments are working
together world-wide to provide alternatives to the
fossil-fuel based transportation systems.
But do all these small contributions amount to anything at
all?
The World Wide Fund, WWF and the European Biomass
Association have calculated that, based on available
technology for producing electricity from biomass, 15% of
all electricity produced in OECD countries could come from
renewable resources by the year 2020, reducing CO2 emissions
then with some 1000 million tonnes per year – an amount
equivalent to what Canada and Italy together emits today.
It is clear that these and similar efforts will make a
difference.
And within the many programmes that UNEP has, there are the
so-called GEO Cities, a programme for cities and
municipalities that is concerned with developing an
assessment methodology to help develop integrated
environmental assessments in municipalities.
We live in a globalised world, a world rich in
opportunities. Let me quote from a more than 60 year old
document that every nation in the world has signed, and let
this be the goal for our efforts here at this conference.
The document is the Charter of the UN signed on October 24
in 1945. We should take inspiration from this document, and
as it states: “strive to establish conditions under which
justice and respect for the obligations arising from
treaties and other sources of international law can be
maintained” as well as promoting “social progress and better
standards of life in larger freedom.”
6 But to accomplish this, we
need also to realise that a sound, healthy and sustainable
environment is a prerequisite for such a process.
Our world has never been richer in global resources, nor
has its peoples had access to more information, research and
technology, or had a deeper and more complete understanding
of the complexities that tie all organisms together in a
globalised unit. The process of globalisation has given us
this. At the same time, our world has never been
exposed to such a combination of threats to our stability,
survival, sustainability and security, while the wealth gap
between nations and within nations becomes ever wider. The
process of globalisation has given us this as well.
We have more opportunities than
ever before in the history of mankind to rectify the wrongs
our careless development has created. Let me
return to the Secretary General’s report to the General
Assembly from which I quoted at the beginning and end this
key-note speech by quoting two paragraphs from the report:
”In our efforts to strengthen the contributions of states,
civil society, the private sector and international
institutions to advancing a vision of larger freedom, we
must ensure that all involved assume their responsibilities
to turn good words into good deeds. We therefore need new
mechanisms to ensure accountability – the accountability of
States to their citizens, of States to each other, of
international institutions to heir members and of the
present generation to future generations. Where there is
accountability we will progress;
Where there is none we will under-perform. “
These are strong and bold words from the Secretary General
of the UN. But he knows full well he or the UN cannot muster
this challenge alone. He therefore comes with the following
statement:
“States, however, cannot do the job alone. We need an active
civil society and a dynamic private sector. Both occupy an
increasingly large and important share of the space formerly
reserved for states alone, and it is plain that the goals
outlined here will not be achieved without their full
engagement.”
Thus, The Secretary General of the UN calls on the
engagement of the most central factor of the UN Charter: “we
the peoples”. And I do believe this is the reason behind his
optimistic statement:
“If we act boldly – and if we act together – we can make
people everywhere more secure, more prosperous and better
able to enjoy their fundamental human rights…. and all the
conditions are in place for us to do so!”4
It is when ‘we the peoples’ have ownership to processes that
mountains can be moved. And who are better positioned than
municipalities to inspire and motivate people. And when
municipalities and civil society come together united in
common efforts to create the foundation for a better future,
things happen.
And this is what the LivCom award is all about – forging
a bond between ideas, creativity, assessments and success
stories and bringing the knowledge from these processes into
municipal projects and programmes to implement liveable
communities.
Your Excellency, the Deputy Mayor of Hangzhou, on behalf of
‘we the people’s” I would like to thank you for your
invitation to host the 2006 LivCom Awards and for
contributing to building a better future;
I would further like to extend a thank to Alan Smith,
Executive Director of the LivCom awards for his creativity
and initiative and that he 10 years ago had the courage to
make a dream come true and found this Award,
I would like to thank and greet the judges for their
diligent and voluntary work in making this award ceremony
one of excellence representing cutting edge understanding of
liveable communities,
and I would like to thank all participants here today,
including their bosses, the Mayors, for their tireless and
hopeful initiatives and work for their constituencies.
Ladies and gentlemen
“If we act boldly – and if we act together – we can make
people everywhere more secure, more prosperous and better
able to enjoy their fundamental human rights….all the
conditions are in place for us to do so!”
We are the ‘conditions’
We are in place,
Let us now make this century vastly better than the one we
have left behind -
We have the power, opportunity, will and resources to do so,
Good luck with the next days in this award winning process
They will be rewarding. End note:
"Educated at the Universities of Oslo, Norway and Uppsala,
Sweden and at St. Olaf College in Minnesota, the US, in
modern history, literature, environmental sciences and
development issues, Jan-Gustav had his debut with the UN and
the environment in the 1970s, which was initiated by the
Stockholm Conference for Environment in 1972 and he has
stayed with this arena ever since. After having worked on
disseminating information on UN issues during the 80s and
early 90s, he has followed and worked with the CSD (UN
Commission for Sustainable Development) process diligently
every year since 1997, when he that year worked as a liaison
officer between the UN and the NGO community at the UN
headquarters in New York. After his first task for the UN in
Latin America in the 70’s, Jan-Gustav has worked and lived
in Botswana, Uganda, the US and Sweden in addition to
Norway; he has extensive NGO experience developed through
three decades in almost all continents in the world. He has
lectured at the University of Oslo, and given workshops and
guest lectures all over the world on governance and
sustainability issues, chaired UN meetings and facilitated
UN processes and authored two books and numerous articles on
the environment. He is presently the UN CSD NGO Global
Coordinator coordinating NGO input into the CSD process as
well as serving on a global civil society committee for UNEP
on civil society policy issues. Jan-Gustav is employed by a
Dutch-based, EU funded international NGO called ANPED (The
Northern Alliance for Sustainability) headquartered in
Amsterdam as their Senior Policy Adviser, but works out of
his home outside Oslo, Norway, when he is not travelling the
world, lecturing or otherwise working abroad on environment
and sustainability issues."
1Quoted from Article 1
in the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” adopted and
proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10
December 1948
2 From UNEP’s ”Urban
Environment Unit” – their web-site
3 Ibid
4 from “In larger
freedom”
5 from UNEP Urban
Environment Unit
6 Quoting form the
Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations.
|